www.AdamTerrell.com

"Not as pleasing men, but God who tests our hearts"(I Thess. 2:4b).

Home Post New Entry

Lo! How a Rose E'er Blooming

Posted by Adam Terrell on December 17, 2010 at 9:42 AM

We sang this at church a few weeks ago at the start of the Christmas season.  I had never heard of it, much less heard it, much less sung it before.  I find myself drawn back to it repeatedly, and I can hardly stop playing through it on the piano.  I definitely envy the time in church history when these were the contemporary hymns of the day.


The hymn sounded terrible the first time, since I was apparently not the only one who was unfamiliar with it, and I was trying to read the bass part; that's what I do.


A few objectively good congregational hymns are still being written such as "Because He Lives."  I would like to write hymn lyrics.  Good melodies are more commonly produced than theologically strong lyrics, and I find it easy to rhyme.  I pray that one of my children will have an affinity for congregational voice composition.


Let's do a comparison of the song in the title and a popular, contemporary one which gets way too much credit and throat time.  I'll save the better one for last.  I'll bet some of you didn't know that there are objective rules to make music good or better.  Well, there are, and guess who discovered them for the twelve-tone scale that we use.  The Father of Music of course!  I wonder how he earned that title.


"I Could Sing of Your Love Forever"


Over the mountains and the sea

Your river runs with love for me

And I will open up my heart

And let the healer set me free

I'm happy to be in the truth

And I will daily lift my hands

For I will always sing

Of when you came down


I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever


Over the mountains and the sea

Your river runs with love for me

And I will open up my heart

And let the healer set me free

I'm happy to be in the truth

And I will daily lift my hands

For I will always sing

Of when your love came down


I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever


Oh, I feel like dancing

This foolishness, I know

But when the world has seen the light

They will dance with joy

Like we're dancing now


I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever

I could sing of your love forever



"Lo, How a Rose E'er Blooming"


Lo, how a rose e'er blooming

From tender stem hath sprung!

Of Jesse's lineage coming

As men of old have sung.

It came, a Flower bright,

Amid the cold of winter,

When half-gone was the night.


Isaiah was foretold it,

The Rose I have in mind;

With Mary we behold it,

The virgin mother kind.

To show God's love aright

She bore to men a Savior,

When half-gone was the night.


This Flower, whose fragrance tender

With sweetness fills the air,

Dispels with glorious splendor

The darkness everywhere.

True man, yet very God,

From sin and death He saves us

And lightens every load.


I chose the former song from this list (http://www.praisecharts.com/ccli-top-100/).  The comparison could be done with any song from there.  I don't appreciate songs that emphasize feelings and feelings instead of feelings and intellect.  God is a God of knowledge.  The Psalms teach us how to feel, which implies that we might have incorrect feelings sometimes.


My feelings need to line up with what I know.  I have nothing against new songs.  Even "Amazing Grace" was new at one point, and I can hardly sing "In Christ Alone" enough times.  I'm referring to the songs that are objectively bad according to the laws of music theory.  I simply think that poorly written songs should not be immortalized.


Let's not sing the song with no harmony where the chorus made up of one sentence repeated eight times is more than half the song.  Let's do sing the song with some skilled effort put into the poetry and an intricate, simple, four-part harmony.


In Christ,

Adam

Categories: Articles

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

3 Comments

Reply William Guess
12:17 PM on December 17, 2010 
So, what are the objective rules for making music better? I've heard that Bach had a checklist, so to speak, but I've never seen the list.

Believe it or not, we have "Lo! How A Rose" on the Christmas CD we made "a million" years ago. If you want a kick then get out the album and listen to me singing tenor an octave up. It's rather amusing, but it's not bad considering our ages. :-)

In complete agreement with your premise in the above article, by the way. Have you ever listened closely to any of Bob Bennett's lyrics?
Reply Adam Terrell
12:28 PM on December 17, 2010 
Bach didn't write it down; his music just emulated it. People who study his work deduce the rules that Bach followed, and then in turn wrote them down. Things like contrary motion in voice, an understanding of chord resolution, the I, IV, V progression, how II can be a substitute for IV, and the list continues. It's basically just standard composition theory.

Here's a great article: http://www.artsreformation.com/a001/ih-music-rules.html

I can't say I've listened to very much Bob Bennet, though I liked what I have heard.
Reply William Guess
01:14 PM on December 17, 2010 
Great article. I need to think about it some more.

I agree that almost all modern music (Including contemporary Christian music) is "addicted to mediocrity". I also absolutely agree that music should follow certain rules. However, I also know that I would radically disagree with some of the "rules" that became common after Bach.

I think defending your favorite music "on the grounds of personal subjectivism" alone is not acceptable. But the problem is that which rules should be included or excluded will be based on personal tastes. And you may find that whereas you've never been able to enjoy the music of a composer who violates "rule 14", maybe a new composer will come along and write a piece of music that purposefully violates rule 14, and yet you still find it pleasant. Then what? Do you throw out rule 14, or just add that "it shouldn't be used except in certain situations...."? The point is I still don't think you'd be able to make everyone agree on which rules to follow. But maybe we should make composers tell which rules they followed in their compositions, even if the particular set of guidelines they use varies from composition to composition. Then we could all determine what types of music we like in a more objective manner, and rock musicians (and contemporary Christian "artists") could just say, "Like, we don't use no rules, man." :-)

Recent Videos

258 views - 2 comments
384 views - 1 comment
653 views - 3 comments
477 views - 2 comments